<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mobile Jaw&#187; Palm Pre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/tag/palm-pre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mobilejaw.com</link>
	<description>Mobile Jaw</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 15:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Otterbox Tandem Case for Palm Pre / Pre Plus</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/08/otterbox-tandem-case-for-palm-pre-pre-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/08/otterbox-tandem-case-for-palm-pre-pre-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Aug 2010 14:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Case]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Otterbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/08/otterbox-tandem-case-for-palm-pre-pre-plus/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’ve had the chance to try out the Otterbox Tandem case on my Palm Pre and really liked it. For those that don&#8217;t know, Otterbox makes protective cases for most popular models of cellphones. For those that have gone through the trauma of a broken phone, this is the way to save having to go [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/08/plm6pre01.6.jpg"><img style="display: inline; margin-left: 0px; margin-right: 0px; border: 0px;" title="plm6-pre01.6" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/08/plm6pre01.6_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="plm6-pre01.6" width="240" height="240" align="right" /></a> I’ve had the chance to try out the <a href="http://www.otterbox.com/palm-cases/palm-pre-cases/palm-pre-tandem-case/" target="_blank">Otterbox Tandem case on my Palm Pre</a> and really liked it.</p>
<p>For those that don&#8217;t know, Otterbox makes protective cases for most popular models of cellphones. For those that have gone through the trauma of a broken phone, this is the way to save having to go to all the support group meetings; just put an Otterbox case on.  Its also very handy for those times you need to hang pictures but can&#8217;t find a hammer. (do NOT try that at home, I&#8217;m a trained professional)</p>
<p>The case for the Palm Pre comes in two pieces to accommodate the sliding keyboard. Also included is a screen protector that just doesn&#8217;t cut it.  More on that in a sec.</p>
<p>The plastic case snapped on very nicely and felt quite secure. In fact, it was actually hard to get the crazy thing off the first  couple times but it does get easier.  Once in place, the two halves allow the keyboard to open and close with just a bit extra resistance. There is a slight lip on the part around the screen to keep the screen away from direct contact to any surface.</p>
<p>While there was no way I was going to test the case by driving over it with my Hummer (if I had one) you can tell that there is a lot more protection there. The case feels good on the hand and although it added bulk it wasn&#8217;t bad considering the protection enhancement.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/08/plm6pre01.4.jpg"><img style="display: inline; border: 0px;" title="plm6-pre01.4" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/08/plm6pre01.4_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="plm6-pre01.4" width="240" height="240" /></a> <a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/08/plm6pre01.5.jpg"><img style="display: inline; border: 0px;" title="plm6-pre01.5" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/08/plm6pre01.5_thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="plm6-pre01.5" width="240" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>The screen protector that is included just does not work for the Pre. It does seem to be a very nice quality but on the bottom it ends at the bottom of the screen.  As anyone who uses a Pre can attest, we spend half our time swiping up from below the screen.  The edge of the screen protector was far to pronounced to make this comfortable.  The protector should have covered the whole screen.</p>
<p>Overall, I liked the case quite a bit. It did crowd the top row of the keyboard a bit too much, but I got used to that.  Highly recommended for keeping your Palm Pre (or any other smartphone) protected; $29.95 well spent!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/08/otterbox-tandem-case-for-palm-pre-pre-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comparing Cameras: Samsung Captivate, SE X10 Mini, Palm Pre</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilejaw.com/reviews/2010/07/comparing-cameras-samsung-captivate-se-x10-mini-palm-pre/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilejaw.com/reviews/2010/07/comparing-cameras-samsung-captivate-se-x10-mini-palm-pre/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 19:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Samsung Captivate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Xperia X10 Mini]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilejaw.com/?p=1864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a quick post to compare the same shot taken with three different phone cameras. Take a look and comment on your opinion of the shots. Samsung Captivate, 5mp camera Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini, 5mp camera Palm Pre, 3mp camera]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a quick post to compare the same shot taken with three different phone cameras.  Take a look and comment on your opinion of the shots.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/07/Pic-Captivate.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1865  aligncenter" title="Pic Captivate" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/07/Pic-Captivate-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" align="center" /></a><br />
Samsung Captivate, 5mp camera</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/07/Pic-X10.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1869  aligncenter" title="Pic X10" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/07/Pic-X10-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" align="center" /></a><br />
Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 Mini, 5mp camera</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/07/Pic-Pre.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-1870  aligncenter" title="Pic Pre" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/07/Pic-Pre-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" align="center" /></a><br />
Palm Pre, 3mp camera</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilejaw.com/reviews/2010/07/comparing-cameras-samsung-captivate-se-x10-mini-palm-pre/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Budget Smartphones: Comparing Cameras</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/05/budget-smartphones-comparing-cameras/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/05/budget-smartphones-comparing-cameras/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Camera]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile Devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nokia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilejaw.com/?p=1552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a little bit I will be putting together a comparison of two low end smartphones; the Nokia 5230 and Palm Pre. The Nokia 5230 sells for just $180 with no contract on the WIND Mobile network and the Palm Pre for $299 on the Bell network. I was actually going to include the HTC [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a little bit I will be putting together a comparison of two low end smartphones; the Nokia 5230 and Palm Pre. The <a href="http://shop.windmobile.ca/ProductCatalog/Handsets/HandsetDetails.aspx?id=Nokia+5230&amp;;;;color=orange">Nokia 5230 sells for just $180 with no contract on the WIND Mobile </a>network and the <a href="http://www.bell.ca/shopping/PalmPre/68346.details">Palm Pre for $299 on the Bell network</a>. I was actually going to include the HTC Hero from Telus but just noticed they have cranked up the price to $499 from $379 and even sell it for the ridiculous price of $249.99 with a 3 year agreement. That is highway robbery, so don&#8217;t even bother. Way to go, Telus!!!</p>
<p>Before I get underway with the full review I wanted to post a picture from each of these phones, as the camera on each is quite good. To test them out I took the same shot twice on each phone and picked the best for each one.</p>
<p>The <strong>Nokia 5230</strong> only has a 2 megapixel camera, so I really wasn&#8217;t expecting much. Of course, as has been said many times before, it&#8217;s not about the megapixels. The 5230 really does prove that point! Pictures are extremely clear and snapping photos is quite quick. I can&#8217;t tell you how nice it is to have a fast camera on a smartphone! So many take way too long to snap and save, but the Nokia is very&#8230;snappy. <img src='http://www.mobilejaw.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The <strong>Palm Pre</strong> has a 3 megapixel camera and is shockingly good, in my opinion. Colours are very vibrant, as is detail and it is also a <em><strong>very </strong></em>fast camera. I found I could snap pictures as quickly as half a second apart!</p>
<p>Enough blabbing! Here are the example shots; the first being from the Nokia and the second from the Palm Pre. Clicking the image will bring up a full sized photo. Tell me what you think!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/05/05182010008.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1553" title="05182010008" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/05/05182010008-300x225.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="225" /></a> <a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/05/CIMG0054.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-medium wp-image-1554" title="CIMG0054" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2010/05/CIMG0054-300x224.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="224" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2010/05/budget-smartphones-comparing-cameras/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Palm Pre &#8211; Latest from Palm is Reviewed Around the Web</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2009/06/palm-pre-latest-from-palm-is-reviewed-around-the-web/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2009/06/palm-pre-latest-from-palm-is-reviewed-around-the-web/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 06:26:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Temporale</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Thoughts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sprint]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2009/06/palm-pre-latest-from-palm-is-reviewed-around-the-web/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I’m pretty sure that you’ve heard a little rumble about Palm’s new smartphone over the last couple days. Palm has been trying hard to generate some buzz around their all new smartphone which runs their new “webOS”. So far, it seems to be working. It hasn’t reached the level of buzz that Apple managed to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I’m pretty sure that you’ve heard a little rumble about Palm’s new smartphone over the last couple days.  Palm has been trying hard to generate some buzz around their all new smartphone which runs their new “webOS”. So far, it seems to be working.  It hasn’t reached the level of buzz that Apple managed to generate.</p>
<p>Palm first announced the Pre back in January at CES in Las Vegas. Last Saturday, Palm, along with Sprint, officially launched the Pre to mixed reviews.  It’s still early and there’s a lot of miss-information floating around about this new device.  The biggest concern seems to be around battery life and whether the device has enough power to make it through a day. We’ll have to wait for more tests to see how it fairs with daily usage.</p>
<p>If you’re looking to learn more about Palms new device, check out the list of reviews that Craig has assembled over at <a href="http://www.gearbits.com/archives/2009/06/palm_pre_review.html">GearBits</a>. It’s a great list of reviews and provides a great amount of information about the Pre. Give it a read and see what people are saying about the latest device from Palm.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2009/06/palm-pre-2.jpg"><img style="border-bottom: 0px; border-left: 0px; display: block; float: none; margin-left: auto; border-top: 0px; margin-right: auto; border-right: 0px" title="palm_pre_2" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2009/06/palm-pre-2-thumb.jpg" border="0" alt="palm_pre_2" width="450" height="270" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilejaw.com/thoughts/2009/06/palm-pre-latest-from-palm-is-reviewed-around-the-web/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Will the Pre be Palm&#8217;s Tonic?</title>
		<link>http://www.mobilejaw.com/articles/2009/05/will-the-pre-be-palms-tonic/</link>
		<comments>http://www.mobilejaw.com/articles/2009/05/will-the-pre-be-palms-tonic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 01:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darren Humphries</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Palm Pre]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mobilejaw.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I got thinking about the Palm Pre the other day and started wondering if it will be enough to save Palm. First let me say that I think the Pre is great and is certainly going to be a successful product on its own but I would think it would have to be a smashing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2009/05/gallery-pre-07.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-438" align="right" title="gallery-pre-07" src="http://www.mobilejaw.com/content/2009/05/gallery-pre-07-300x222.jpg" alt="Palm Pre" width="300" height="222" /></a>I got thinking about the Palm Pre the other day and started wondering if it will be enough to save Palm.</p>
<p>First let me say that I think the Pre is great and is certainly going to be a successful product on its own but I would think it would have to be a smashing success to keep a whole company afloat. Yes, Palm still has the Treo Pro and Centro but those have not been anywhere near hot enough to get Palm out of its financial hole despite the number of units they have sold.</p>
<p>The argument of whether the Pre is going to be better than the iPhone, Blackberry, Windows Phone or Nokia is not the question here.  There is no doubt that many will prefer the Pre and as such will buy one.  But the Pre would need to be a runaway commercial success and I don&#8217;t think that it will.</p>
<p>Most of the buzz for the Pre has been coming from people that know about mobile phones.  They can see that much of what Palm has done has been a very nice evolutionary step for smartphones, especially for social networking smartphones.  They understand how different those things are from current offerings and are able to decide whether they will buy one or not.  Still, many of these mobile enthusiasts will just take a wait-and-see approach because they already have a smartphone that works just fine.</p>
<p>So, who will buy the Pre?  Will it convert the faithful from the iPhone?  Will it erode Windows Phone sales?  Is the Blackberry is danger of losing some of its momentum? Or will it draw in an all new crowd of feature phone users that are ready to upgrade to the big time?</p>
<p>All of the above platforms are going to have some defectors, but again, Pre needs to be a very big success to keep Palm alive.  Let’s take a look at each of the above.</p>
<p>First, iPhone:  I highly doubt we are going to see a lot of people dropping their iPhones for the Pre.  The iPhone will do most of what the Pre will do and the iPhone has some kind of Voodoo hold on its user’s minds.  Most are white-knuckling their iPhones and will not let go for anything.  Plus, with 3.0 coming out they have more functionality to play with.  I just don&#8217;t think there will be a lot of people walking out of the iPhone camp.</p>
<p>Windows Mobile users: I can see Pre actually stealing a lot of the Windows Phone users.  WM users tend to be less emotionally tied to the OS than iPhone users; it&#8217;s more about functionality.  If the Pre can do everything WM can then it is not a hard decision.  Unfortunately for the Palm they are really targeting consumers and not business users with the Pre.  There are bound to be a lot of WM users that will consider the Pre to be only for social networking despite this not being the case.  Plus, WM come in MANY different shapes and sizes while the Pre is only coming out in one form (unless the Palm Eos is real).</p>
<p>Blackberry:  Nope.  I just don&#8217;t see this affecting Blackberry sales much at all.  Blackberry phones are like cockroaches (is it possible to mean that in a good way?), they can survive anything!</p>
<p>Feature and regular cellphone users: Sure, there will be a good number that decide to make the move up and get a Pre but I still doubt the numbers are going to be significant enough.  Many just want their phone to be phones and don’t want the added expense of a data plan.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that the Pre has a chance of keeping Palm alive but I think it is a pretty slim one.  It’s going to be a fantastic phone but I doubt it is going to be enough for Palm&#8217;s ultimate survival.  If Palm was to follow up the Pre with a number of new form factors they would potentially be able to create enough momentum to make it through but that takes money and erodes the profitability of the Pre itself.</p>
<p>Honestly, I hope I am wrong.  I was a Palm user all the way back to the III and used to write a guide to sales software for Palm.  I would love to see them survive and bring out more products like the Pre.  I just can&#8217;t help but think that they will end up being bought out by someone else.  That isn&#8217;t all bad as long as they can remain intact as a group in order to continue to advance the platform, but only time will tell if that future is autonomous for Palm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.mobilejaw.com/articles/2009/05/will-the-pre-be-palms-tonic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

